Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/ohio-portfolio/ohio-portfolio.php:169) in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/wp-super-cache/wp-cache-phase2.php on line 1589

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/ohio-portfolio/ohio-portfolio.php:169) in /var/www/html/wp-includes/feed-rss2.php on line 8
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>yorkfield &#8211; comptoir de test</title>
	<atom:link href="https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/tag/yorkfield/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 17:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>fr-FR</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Wolfdale vs Yorkfield vs Ivy Bridge : 7 ans pour changer l&#8217;usage d&#8217;un PC ?</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/21277/wolfdale-vs-yorkfield-vs-ivy-bridge-7-ans-pour-changer-lusage-dun-pc/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/21277/wolfdale-vs-yorkfield-vs-ivy-bridge-7-ans-pour-changer-lusage-dun-pc/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 17:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Processeurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualcore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quadcore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolfdale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorkfield]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=21277</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Depuis l&#8217;avènement des puces dualcores, l&#8217;usage du PC a considérablement changé. Premier...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/21277/wolfdale-vs-yorkfield-vs-ivy-bridge-7-ans-pour-changer-lusage-dun-pc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Un nouveau Yorkfield en approche</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/8120/un-nouveau-yorkfield-en-approche/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/8120/un-nouveau-yorkfield-en-approche/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Processeurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorkfield]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=8120</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Intel va lancer si on en croit nos confr&#232;res de Fudzilla un...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/8120/un-nouveau-yorkfield-en-approche/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>680i et Yorkfield: OK chez Asus et DFI</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/2880/680i-et-yorkfield-ok-chez-asus-et-dfi/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/2880/680i-et-yorkfield-ok-chez-asus-et-dfi/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes mères]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dfi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorkfield]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=2880</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Alors que le non support des Quad Core Penryn &#233;tait une des...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/2880/680i-et-yorkfield-ok-chez-asus-et-dfi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>X48 et Yorkfield 9770 : ça vaut quoi?</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/2862/x48-et-yorkfield-9770-ca-vaut-quoi/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/2862/x48-et-yorkfield-9770-ca-vaut-quoi/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 09:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes mères]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x48]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorkfield]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=2862</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Derri&#232;re cette question&#160;saupoudr&#233;e d&#8217;une pointe d&#8217;ironie se cache une r&#233;ponse dont nous...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/2862/x48-et-yorkfield-9770-ca-vaut-quoi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD Opteron K10 2350 vs Xeon Yorkfield 5472</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/2525/amd-opteron-k10-2350-vs-xeon-yorkfield-5472/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/2525/amd-opteron-k10-2350-vs-xeon-yorkfield-5472/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 07:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Processeurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[k10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opteron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorkfield]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=2525</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nos confr&#232;res d&#8217;Anandtech ont test&#233; un Opteron architecture K10 2350 qui a...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/2525/amd-opteron-k10-2350-vs-xeon-yorkfield-5472/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>nForce i680 et Yorkfield ne font pas bon ménage</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/2524/nforce-i680-et-yorkfield-ne-font-pas-bon-menage/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/2524/nforce-i680-et-yorkfield-ne-font-pas-bon-menage/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Le comptoir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes mères]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorkfield]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=2524</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On peut dire que la situation n&#8217;&#233;tait pas tr&#232;s claire jusqu&#8217;&#224; maintenant....]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/2524/nforce-i680-et-yorkfield-ne-font-pas-bon-menage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yorkfield QX9650 : 1 record et des top scores</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/2316/yorkfield-qx9650-1-record-et-des-top-scores/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/2316/yorkfield-qx9650-1-record-et-des-top-scores/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 15:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Processeurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qx9650]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorkfield]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=2316</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[4 petits gras gars su&#233;dois et finlandais connus dans le monde de...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/2316/yorkfield-qx9650-1-record-et-des-top-scores/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 Ghz pour le Yorkfield !!!</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/2160/6-ghz-pour-le-yorkfield/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/2160/6-ghz-pour-le-yorkfield/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Le comptoir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Processeurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ghz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorkfield]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=2160</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Eh oui, la bataille faisait rage entre les X6800, E6700 et r&#233;cemment...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/2160/6-ghz-pour-le-yorkfield/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Davantage de benchs des Wolfdale et Yorkfield</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/1686/davantage-de-benchs-des-wolfdale-et-yorkfield/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/1686/davantage-de-benchs-des-wolfdale-et-yorkfield/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 17:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Processeurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolfdale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorkfield]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=1686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nous vous faisions part il y a seulement trois jours des tous...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/1686/davantage-de-benchs-des-wolfdale-et-yorkfield/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bench du Yorkfield</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/1580/bench-du-yorkfield/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/1580/bench-du-yorkfield/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Le comptoir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Processeurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorkfield]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=1580</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">La prochaine architecture Penryn d&#8217;Intel se d&#233;voile de plus en plus via les Yorkfield Quad-core et les Wolfdale Dual-core. Ces benchmarks ne proviennent &#233;videmment pas d&#8217;Intel himself mais des premiers chanceux qui ont eu la possibilit&#233; de tester certains processeurs ES (engineering sample). Intel a annonc&#233; r&#233;cemment que son Peryn sortirait en avance, cela ne nous surprend gu&#232;re, leurs puces semblent parfaitement fonctionnelles et les performances sont au rendez-vous.</p>
<div style="text-align: justify;">&#160;</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Un membre du forum <a href="http://www.xfastest.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.xfastest.com</a> a mis en ligne quelques images de bench.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;"><img class=" size-full wp-image-49541" width="300" height="225" src="https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/yorkfield-744.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;"><a target="_self" href="http://www.comptoir-hardware.com/actus/processeurs/1580-bench-du-yorkfield.html" rel="noopener">Cliquez ici pour voir la suite</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">&#160;</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/1580/bench-du-yorkfield/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>