Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/ohio-portfolio/ohio-portfolio.php:169) in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/wp-super-cache/wp-cache-phase2.php on line 1589

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/ohio-portfolio/ohio-portfolio.php:169) in /var/www/html/wp-includes/feed-rss2.php on line 8
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>vs &#8211; comptoir de test</title>
	<atom:link href="https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/tag/vs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:30:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>fr-FR</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Sixense STEM : le compagnon idéal pour l&#8217;Oculus Rift ?</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/24910/sixense-steme-le-compagnon-ideal-pour-loculus-rift/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/24910/sixense-steme-le-compagnon-ideal-pour-loculus-rift/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Le comptoir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[IA & VR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oculus rift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[réalité virtuelle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=24910</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[La réalité virtuelle a réellement le vent en poupe. Entre le rachat...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/24910/sixense-steme-le-compagnon-ideal-pour-loculus-rift/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cooler Master confirme l&#8217;arrivée proche de trois alimentations VS</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/22753/cooler-master-confirme-larrivee-des-alimentations-vs/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/22753/cooler-master-confirme-larrivee-des-alimentations-vs/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Oct 2013 18:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Alimentations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alimentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[master]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=22753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Il y a peu Thibaut vous a annoncé l&#8217;arrivée d&#8217;une nouvelle gamme...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/22753/cooler-master-confirme-larrivee-des-alimentations-vs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catalyst 9.8 VS 9.7 : des gains intéressants</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/8018/catalyst-98-vs-97-des-gains-interessants/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/8018/catalyst-98-vs-97-des-gains-interessants/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes Graphiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=8018</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Et ne perdons pas de temps, apr&#232;s cette annonce officielle, pour vous...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/8018/catalyst-98-vs-97-des-gains-interessants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia CUDA VS ATI Stream : un test</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/7968/nvidia-cuda-vs-ati-stream-un-test/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/7968/nvidia-cuda-vs-ati-stream-un-test/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Software • Pilotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=7968</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[PC Perspective s&#8217;est pench&#233; sur le cas du CUDA et de l&#8217;ATI...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/7968/nvidia-cuda-vs-ati-stream-un-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clarkdale Core i3 3.06GHz VS E8400</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/7846/clarkdale-core-i3-306ghz-vs-e8400/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/7846/clarkdale-core-i3-306ghz-vs-e8400/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Processeurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clarkdale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e8400]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=7846</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Le site IT168 a publi&#233; r&#233;cemment un duel de processeurs qui pourrait...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/7846/clarkdale-core-i3-306ghz-vs-e8400/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GeForce 190.15 VS 186.18 VS 185.85</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/7495/geforce-19015-vs-18618-vs-18585/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/7495/geforce-19015-vs-18618-vs-18585/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes Graphiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[185]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[186]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[190]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=7495</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[VR-Zone vient de r&#233;aliser un petit comparatif opposant les 3 derniers pilotes...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/7495/geforce-19015-vs-18618-vs-18585/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>X2 250 VS X2 550 VS E6300 chez Matbe</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/7465/x2-250-vs-x2-550-vs-e6300-chez-matbe/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/7465/x2-250-vs-x2-550-vs-e6300-chez-matbe/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Processeurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[550]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e6300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matbe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x2]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=7465</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nos confr&#232;res viennent en effet de publier un article traitant des nouveaux...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/7465/x2-250-vs-x2-550-vs-e6300-chez-matbe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Piratage VS ventes pour les Sims 3, qui l&#8217;emporte ?</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/7424/piratage-vs-ventes-pour-les-sims-3-qui-lemporte/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/7424/piratage-vs-ventes-pour-les-sims-3-qui-lemporte/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Jeux vidéo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piratage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=7424</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nous vous en parlions fin mai, le piratage a &#233;t&#233; tr&#232;s actif...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/7424/piratage-vs-ventes-pour-les-sims-3-qui-lemporte/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>HD4770 VS HD4850 sur 12 jeux</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6880/hd4770-vs-hd4850-sur-12-jeux/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6880/hd4770-vs-hd4850-sur-12-jeux/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes Graphiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd4770]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd4850]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=6880</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Le site chinois IT168.com a mis en ligne un article opposant la HD4770 &#224; la HD4850. Comme vous le savez, la HD4770 est amen&#233;e &#224; remplacer la HD4830, et donc se situer juste en dessous de la 4850 dans la nouvelle gamme d'ATI. Le test, r&#233;alis&#233; sous 12 jeux n'est actuellement plus en ligne donc il ne nous est pas possible pour le moment d'en savoir plus sur les r&#233;glages graphiques utilis&#233;s, mais nous avons pu r&#233;cup&#233;rer les graphes de performances. A noter d'ailleurs que les valeurs en ordonn&#233;es (les pourcentages) n'ont aucun sens, seules les courbes sont &#224; observer, elles indiquent le niveau de la HD4770 face &#224; sa grande soeur. Graphes en suite de news.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&#160;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class=" size-full wp-image-51678" height="180" width="194" alt="" src="https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/ati_graphics_logo-aa1.png" /></p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6880/hd4770-vs-hd4850-sur-12-jeux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>768 vidéos VS 1 seul SSD</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6817/768-videos-vs-1-seul-ssd/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6817/768-videos-vs-1-seul-ssd/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Stockage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=6817</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lors du Storage Networking World, Fusion-io a propos&#233; une d&#233;monstration tr&#232;s impressionnante...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6817/768-videos-vs-1-seul-ssd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crossfire de HD4890 VS SLI de GTX 275 : verdict ?</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6785/crossfire-de-hd4890-vs-sli-de-gtx-275-verdict/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6785/crossfire-de-hd4890-vs-sli-de-gtx-275-verdict/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes Graphiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[275]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crossfire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd4890]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=6785</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[C&#8217;est au tour de nos confr&#232;res de Matbe de publier leur article...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6785/crossfire-de-hd4890-vs-sli-de-gtx-275-verdict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>HD4890 VS GTX 275 : les dégagements thermiques</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6777/hd4890-vs-gtx-275-les-degagements-thermiques/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6777/hd4890-vs-gtx-275-les-degagements-thermiques/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes Graphiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[275]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd4890]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=6777</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hardware.fr a mis &#224; jour son article traitant des d&#233;gagements thermiques des...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6777/hd4890-vs-gtx-275-les-degagements-thermiques/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>HD4890 VS GTX 275 : les face à face !</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6732/hd4890-vs-gtx-275-les-face-a-face/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6732/hd4890-vs-gtx-275-les-face-a-face/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes Graphiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[275]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd4890]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=6732</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Les HD4890 et GTX 275 sont donc officiellement l&#226;ch&#233;es dans l&#8217;ar&#232;ne et...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6732/hd4890-vs-gtx-275-les-face-a-face/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GeForce VS Radeon : la qualité d&#8217;image en question</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6267/geforce-vs-radeon-la-qualite-dimage-en-question/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6267/geforce-vs-radeon-la-qualite-dimage-en-question/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes Graphiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=6267</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Voici un article qui devrait int&#233;resser les puristes. En effet si 9...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6267/geforce-vs-radeon-la-qualite-dimage-en-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista SP1 VS Vista SP2 RC: match de performances</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6207/vista-sp1-vs-vista-sp2-rc-match-de-performances/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6207/vista-sp1-vs-vista-sp2-rc-match-de-performances/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Software • Pilotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sp1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sp2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=6207</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Le site TweakTown a mis en ligne un duel de performances opposant...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6207/vista-sp1-vs-vista-sp2-rc-match-de-performances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>HD4670 GDDR4 VS GDDR3, de la mémoire mais pas que&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6131/hd4670-gddr4-vs-gddr3-de-la-memoire-mais-pas-que/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6131/hd4670-gddr4-vs-gddr3-de-la-memoire-mais-pas-que/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes Graphiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gddr3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gddr4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd4670]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=6131</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nous vous la pr&#233;sentions il y a un peu moins de 2...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/6131/hd4670-gddr4-vs-gddr3-de-la-memoire-mais-pas-que/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GTX260 55nm VS 65nm</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/5866/gtx260-55nm-vs-65nm/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/5866/gtx260-55nm-vs-65nm/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes Graphiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[55nm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[65nm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx260]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=5866</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Le site Expreview a mis en ligne un premier dual entre GTX260...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/5866/gtx260-55nm-vs-65nm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeux VS Réalité chez THFR</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/5530/jeux-vs-realite-chez-thfr/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/5530/jeux-vs-realite-chez-thfr/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Jeux vidéo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[réalité]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thfr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=5530</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nos confr&#232;res de Tom&#8217;s Hardware France viennent de publier la deuxi&#232;me partie...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/5530/jeux-vs-realite-chez-thfr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dual VS Quad Core en jeu: Nvidia progresse, ATI stagne</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/5516/dual-vs-quad-core-en-jeu-nvidia-progresse-ati-stagne/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/5516/dual-vs-quad-core-en-jeu-nvidia-progresse-ati-stagne/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Processeurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=5516</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nos confr&#232;res de Hardware.fr viennent de mener une petite s&#233;rie de tests...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/5516/dual-vs-quad-core-en-jeu-nvidia-progresse-ati-stagne/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GeForce 178.24 VS 180.43</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/5270/geforce-17824-vs-18043/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/5270/geforce-17824-vs-18043/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes Graphiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[178]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[180]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[24]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=5270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Le site TechConnect Magazine vient de publier un comparatif entre les deux...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/5270/geforce-17824-vs-18043/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crossfire de HD4870 X2 VS Tri-SLI de GTX280</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/5257/crossfire-de-hd4870-x2-vs-tri-sli-de-gtx280/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/5257/crossfire-de-hd4870-x2-vs-tri-sli-de-gtx280/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes Graphiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crossfire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx280]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd4870]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tri-sli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x2]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=5257</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Voil&#224; le duel au somment que nous proposent en ce d&#233;but de...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/5257/crossfire-de-hd4870-x2-vs-tri-sli-de-gtx280/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nano VS Atom VS Athlon, combat de watts</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/5081/nano-vs-atom-vs-athlon-combat-de-watts/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/5081/nano-vs-atom-vs-athlon-combat-de-watts/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Processeurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athlon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=5081</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nos confr&#232;res de Tom&#8217;s Hardware, qui avaient d&#233;j&#224; publi&#233; u article opposant...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/5081/nano-vs-atom-vs-athlon-combat-de-watts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GeForce 177.98 VS 177.92: le verdict</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4908/geforce-17798-vs-17792-le-verdict/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4908/geforce-17798-vs-17792-le-verdict/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes Graphiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[177]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[92]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=4908</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Comme &#224; son habitude, le site Expreview s&#8217;est empress&#233; de tester les...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4908/geforce-17798-vs-17792-le-verdict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>175.19 WHQL VS 177.92 béta</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4824/17519-whql-vs-17792-beta/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4824/17519-whql-vs-17792-beta/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes Graphiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[175]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[177]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[19'']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[92]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whql]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=4824</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Le site Expreview a r&#233;alis&#233; un comparatif opposant les derniers pilotes GeForce...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4824/17519-whql-vs-17792-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A64 2000+ VS Atom 230: le match (MAJ)</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4745/a64-2000-vs-atom-230-le-match-maj/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4745/a64-2000-vs-atom-230-le-match-maj/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Processeurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a64]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=4745</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AMD a en effet mis au point un A64 basse fr&#233;quence pour...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4745/a64-2000-vs-atom-230-le-match-maj/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catalyst 8.8 VS 8.7: un nouveau test</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4777/catalyst-88-vs-87-un-nouveau-test/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4777/catalyst-88-vs-87-un-nouveau-test/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes Graphiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=4777</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Les Catalyst 8.8 viennent tout juste de sortir, et apr&#232;s un premier test r&#233;alis&#233; par TweakTown dont nous vous <a href="http://www.comptoir-hardware.com/actus/cartes-graphiques/4766-les-catalyst-88-sont-la-et-meme-deja-testes.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">parlions hier</a>, c'est aujourd'hui Expreview qui s'y colle avec un nouveau face-&#224;-face entre ces nouveaux Catalyst et la mouture pr&#233;c&#233;dente datant de juillet. Au menu 9 jeux et 3DMark Vantage condens&#233;s en un tableau que nous vous proposons en suite de la news. L'occasion de constater que pour Expreview ces pilotes apportent un gain de performances non n&#233;gligeable sous Devil May Cry et Assassin's Creed avec environ 10% de mieux, ainsi que pour les bencheurs 5% de mieux sous 3DMark Vantage. Des r&#233;sultats surprenants, ATI n'ayant pas indiqu&#233; de gain de performances &#224; attendre de sa cuv&#233;e ao&#251;t 2008 de Catalyst.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&#160;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class=" size-full wp-image-49329" height="129" width="320" src="https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/catalyst_logo-635.jpg" alt="" /></p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4777/catalyst-88-vs-87-un-nouveau-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Petit duel amusant: X1950Pro VS HD4850</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4677/petit-duel-amusant-x1950pro-vs-hd4850/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4677/petit-duel-amusant-x1950pro-vs-hd4850/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes Graphiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd4850]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x1950pro]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=4677</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Un peu de fraicheur dans ce monde de brutes, voil&#224; ce que...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4677/petit-duel-amusant-x1950pro-vs-hd4850/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SSD OCZ Core VS WD VelociRaptor</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4616/ssd-ocz-core-vs-wd-velociraptor/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4616/ssd-ocz-core-vs-wd-velociraptor/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 09:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Stockage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[velociraptor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=4616</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Les tests des SSD de la s&#233;rie OCZ Core sont tr&#232;s attendus,...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4616/ssd-ocz-core-vs-wd-velociraptor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>XP SP3 VS Vista SP1, le retour de la revanche</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4602/xp-sp3-vs-vista-sp1-le-retour-de-la-revanche/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4602/xp-sp3-vs-vista-sp1-le-retour-de-la-revanche/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Software • Pilotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sp1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sp3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xp]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=4602</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Le site DragonSteelMods vient de mettre en ligne un nouveau duel entre...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4602/xp-sp3-vs-vista-sp1-le-retour-de-la-revanche/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>HD4850 VS HD4870: quel est l&#8217;impact de la GDDR5 ?</title>
		<link>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4517/hd4850-vs-hd4870-quel-est-limpact-de-la-gddr5/</link>
					<comments>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4517/hd4850-vs-hd4870-quel-est-limpact-de-la-gddr5/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartes Graphiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gddr5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd4850]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd4870]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/?p=4517</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nos confr&#232;res de Hardware.fr viennent de mettre en ligne un article opposant...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://test.comptoir-hardware.com/4517/hd4850-vs-hd4870-quel-est-limpact-de-la-gddr5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>